How a Bill is Scored

An important part of the bill process is the Budget Committee reviewing bill and giving it a score which will be looked at during voting on the bill. Below is the current rubric being used and an explanation of how to obtain/lose points.

Does it reach the on-campus student?

This focuses on the size of the program.

• 2 points: Campus-wide, All Hall, or Neighborhood programs
• 1 point: Floor or Organizational
• 0 points: Not for on-campus students

Does it impact the on-campus student?

This focuses on the effect of the program on residents.

• 2 points: Very impactful (possible professional presence or major takeaway)
• 1 point: Impactful (moderate takeaway)
• 0 points: Little to no impact (no mental, physical, or educational takeaway)

Is it accessible for the target audience?

This focuses on the location of the program.

• 1 point: On-campus or off-campus with planned transportation
• 0 points: Off-campus with no planned transportation

Is there another source of funding?

This focuses on the funding provided by the host.

• 1 point: At least 25% of funding provided by host
• 0 points: Under 25% provided by host

Is it cost efficient?

This focuses on cost per person for the program.

• 2 points: Very cost efficient
• 1 point: Cost efficient
• 0 points: Not cost efficient

Is it reasonable?

This focuses on the practicality of the items listed in the bill budget.

• 2 points: Items listed are reasonable
• 1 point: Small amount of unnecessary items
• 0 points: Many unnecessary or unreasonable items

Is it sustainable?

This focuses on the sustainable practices in the program.

• 1 point: There are sustainable practices (recycling used decorations, etc.)
• 0 points: No sustainable practices

After review, the rubric will be presented to House and Budget Committee will declare their recommendation of the bill.

• 0-6 points: Not endorsed by Budget Committee

• 7-10 points: Endorsed by Budget Committee

 

Direct any questions to Director of Internal Affairs at ricdia@uark.edu